Sahara
97037
Inside a
shock-melt vein.
A petrographic, geochemical and spectroscopic investigation of an unusual LL7 ordinary chondrite and the shock-melt vein preserved within it.

A dark line.
A deeper question.
Sahara 97037 is an LL7 ordinary chondrite. LL refers to the low-iron, low-metal group; type 7 records intense thermal processing, with original chondrule textures largely erased.
In transmitted light, a nearly opaque vein approximately 2.9 mm thick cuts sharply through the olivine-dominated host. What created it, and what happened to the material beside it?

At the margin,
the texture changes.
Within the vein, SEM imaging reveals fine-grained, euhedral olivine and pyroxene, approximately 10–25 μm across, with melt textures.
Immediately beside the vein, grains are larger: approximately 50–100 μm, with granoblastic textures. The contrast helps constrain how the vein affected its surroundings.
Petrography, BSE imaging, and reported compositions
Optical petrography used an Olympus BH2 microscope. Backscattered electron imaging used a Hitachi S4700 field emission scanning electron microscope.
The detailed abstract reports pyroxene at En₉₇ and two olivine compositions, Fo₉₅ and Fo₆₅, within the vein. These are reported analytical findings, not compositions inferred from image brightness.
↗ Detailed abstract · methods and resultsThe chemistry
has a geography.
Full-section maps preserve the relation between the vein and its host. Explore the magnesium signal and the Fe/Ni/S composite, with their original scale bars intact.
Three chemical regions.
The Mg map distinguishes the host, the vein, and the coarser granoblastic material beside it. Brighter pixels indicate relatively greater Mg signal.
The abstract reports slight Mg enrichment in the vein and stronger enrichment immediately alongside it. These are relative spatial differences; the image is not a calibrated concentration readout.
EPMA / WDS mapping details
Analyses used a five-spectrometer Cameca SX5-Tactis at the American Museum of Natural History. Wavelength dispersive spectroscopy was used for quantitative point analyses and elemental mapping.
Mapping parameters: 40 nA beam current, 15 ms dwell time, 6 μm step size. The full section is a mosaic of 15 EPMA maps, collected over three passes of five elements.
The abstract contains an inconsistent unit in its point-analysis voltage sentence. That voltage is left unreported here; see research notes.
Read the minerals
through light.
Raman analysis identifies four phases within the vein. The distinction between an identification and a qualified interpretation remains part of the story.
Olivine
845 · 820 cm⁻¹Smaller feature near 912 cm⁻¹.
The dominant pair of bands supports an olivine identification.
Band positions follow the detailed abstract. The displayed plot retains the original curves and axes; selecting a phase changes the explanation.
Raman mapping details
WiTec Alpha300R confocal Raman microscope; 532 nm laser at approximately 20 mW; 0.7 second integration; 300 grooves/mm spectral grating. Reported mapping resolution: 751 nm.
The detailed abstract places “likely clinoenstatite” with phase 2 and describes phase 4 as fine-grained pyroxene. This takes priority over the less specific poster caption.
↗ Detailed abstract · Raman resultsMelting leaves
more than a vein.
The working interpretation
The large vein is interpreted as a shock-melt vein. Its fine-grained textures are consistent with crystallization from melt; the coarser granoblastic material near the margin is interpreted as localized contact metamorphism associated with that vein.
This connects the mineral record to both shock and thermal overprinting in a highly processed LL chondrite.
The investigation continues
Wadsleyite and ringwoodite had not yet been observed in the studied vein. That is an observation within the scope of this investigation, rather than proof of their absence throughout the meteorite.
The abstract identifies continued structural analysis of the vein margin as ongoing work. The pyroxene identification remains qualified as likely clinoenstatite.
Return to
the evidence.
Research team: Faruq Anjorin, Steven J. Jaret, Rondi Davies, Marina Gemma.
Read the original poster at your own pace. Open the viewer to zoom, pan, or view the source document.
Sources & research notes ↗From sample to story
Let’s talk
science.
Research, collaboration, opportunities, or an interesting question — I’d be glad to connect.
Send me a message ↗faruq.anjorin52@login.cuny.edu